Cloudwater, cask & the future of beer

In Uncategorized on January 2, 2017 by kmflett

Cloudwater, cask & the future of beer


From an earlier Cloudwater blog

The blog post from Cloudwater on where they’ve been in 2016 and where they hope to go in 2017 makes fascinating reading:

It has also attracted a lot of social media comment (including some which is unfortunately not to the point).

The post covers what beer styles Cloudwater plan to focus on, concerns about off flavours in beer, where the beer market in general is headed and a good deal else. Much of the comment has however been focused on the decision to stop producing cask in 2017.

I’ve had Cloudwater cask beers on numbers of occasions and enjoyed them. I agree with the blog though that their better known beers (including the DIPA range) are not usually on cask. For start pubs that can sell a cask of a 9% beer in 5 days or so are limited.

There is also without doubt an issue about point of sale drinkability for cask. I posted this on a recent comment on CAMRA’s revitalisation project (CAMRA also recognises it is a huge concern btw). To get a pint of cask in tip-top condition, the pinnacle of the brewer’s art (as the Cloudwater blog notes) is just too rare at the moment.

The blog argues that well-made cask beer is priced too cheaply in the market meaning that profit margins are low to non-existent. Again as I’ve posted elsewhere undercutting on price (and usually quality) is a persistent feature of market economies and has been since Victorian times. It is to be deplored but in order to actually stop it a revolution is required. Another time perhaps.

I agree too that chains like Wetherspoons squeeze breweries on price so they can sell cheaply (often too cheaply). This is not the fault of CAMRA, despite some ill-considered social media posts suggesting that it is. It’s true CAMRA has focused on beer prices and frankly if you are on Job Seekers Allowance, the State Pension or the Minimum Wage you might be able to understand why. Paying £5 or more for a pint is not possible on such a low income. I don’t think anyone has yet started a campaign focused on arguing that the less well-off should not be able to drink beer though I suspect it has crossed the mind of Iain Duncan Smith.

It’s not the job of Cloudwater to solve this issue, they have a business to run and if it isn’t successful discussion about how their beers should be served will be academic.

Generally I think paying more for well-made cask is acceptable at the same time as looking at whether or not mass produced cask beers like Doom Bar really do have secondary fermentation of any note in the cask or are just churned out at a certain market price point (CAMRA is proposing to do that too btw).

So what is my issue with Cloudwater stopping cask? It is that one of the UK’s best breweries will disappear from visibility for many drinkers, just, as for example, Camden has. Cask is the majority of the beer market in the UK (being pressed hard by the likes of John Smith’s Smooth- a big seller in Wetherspoons) and in many locations craft keg beers hardly exist in pubs. That is changing and the world might look different in 5 years time.

Meantime if a brewery does not produce cask which appears on bar tops in pubs in that form its beers are out of sight and out of mind for many beer drinkers.

The balance between cask and keg production for regional brewers like Adnams and Fullers may well change (if they find the market is there) but as the last CAMRA revitalisation update notes even if the Campaign wound up and it has created a demand for cask that would take decades to dwindle.

So there is a wider point about market impact in continuing to do some cask. I note that Cloudwater have tweeted that they might consider doing cask in their tap room as it develops. Good. That seems to me a prudent approach.

The Cloudwater blog makes clear that they hope what they say will help cask to find a way forward and at the craft keg/cask debate at Indyman in 2016 Jenn Merrick of Beavertown was clear that she thought at some point cask would find that way.

I think there is a real danger that ‘interesting’ beers will migrate to keg only leaving the perfectly Ok but perhaps a little dull in cask. I dont drink that much beer in pint measures (and it would nearly always be cask) but I know from drinking (on occasion) with union colleagues that they prefer, as many do, to drink pints. Pints that is of quite low strength beer that does not challenge their taste buds or is slightly different each time they try it. A poverty of ambition in my view to which they invariably respond examining my extra hoppy half pint- ‘how strong?’ There is a whole drinking culture and not one that should be left to Greene King ipa and Doom Bar.

Anyway I’ll be continuing to drink Cloudwater beers in 2017 (I hope) and if you haven’t read the blog then you should.

Thanks to Megan Davies (@megfdavies) who I discussed this post with. As usual I take complete responsibility for my own comments






One Response to “Cloudwater, cask & the future of beer”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: